Опубликован 17.05.2026
Ключевые слова
- international market entry, entry modes, multinational enterprises, internationalization, OLI framework, transaction cost theory, global strategy
Как цитировать
Аннотация
The globalization of markets has fundamentally transformed the competitive landscape in which firms operate, compelling organizations to seek growth opportunities beyond their domestic boundaries. International market entry strategy selection represents one of the most consequential decisions that multinational enterprises (MNEs) and emerging international firms must make. This paper critically examines the significance of international market entry strategies, analyzing the primary modes available to firms—including exporting, licensing, joint ventures, strategic alliances, and wholly owned subsidiaries—and evaluating the conditions under which each approach is most advantageous. Drawing on established theoretical frameworks such as the Uppsala Internationalization Model, Dunning's Eclectic Paradigm (OLI Framework), and Transaction Cost Theory, this study highlights how the selection of an appropriate entry mode profoundly influences a firm's competitive positioning, resource allocation, risk exposure, and long-term performance in foreign markets. The paper further demonstrates that misalignment between entry strategy and contextual factors—including host country institutional environment, psychic distance, and firm-specific capabilities—can result in substantial financial losses and reputational damage. The findings underscore the necessity for firms to adopt a systematic, evidence-based approach to international market entry strategy formulation.
Библиографические ссылки
- Anderson, E., & Gatignon, H. (1986). Modes of foreign entry: A transaction cost analysis and propositions. Journal of International Business Studies, 17(3), 1–26.
- Brouthers, K. D., & Brouthers, L. E. (2003). Why service and manufacturing entry mode choices differ: The influence of transaction cost factors, risk and trust. Journal of Management Studies, 40(5), 1179–1204.
- Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4(16), 386–405.
- Dunning, J. H. (1988). The eclectic paradigm of international production: A restatement and some possible extensions. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(1), 1–31.
- Inkpen, A. C., & Beamish, P. W. (1997). Knowledge, bargaining power, and the instability of international joint ventures. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 177–202.
- Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. E. (1977). The internationalization process of the firm: A model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, 8(1), 23–32.
- Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. E. (2009). The Uppsala internationalization process model revisited: From liability of foreignness to liability of outsidership. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(9), 1411–1431.
- Killing, J. P. (1983). Strategies for Joint Venture Success. Praeger Publishers.
- Root, F. R. (1994). Entry Strategies for International Markets (Rev. ed.). Lexington Books.
- Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. Free Press.
- Williamson, O. E. (1985). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. Free Press.